Government Recommendations To Date COUNTRY
Australian Senate Inquiry into Air Safety - BAe 146
Cabin Air Quality – October 2000 - Recommendations
(a)
The Committee recommends that CASA should reassess matters recommended
for further action by the BASI/ATSB incident report (No. 199702276) concerning
the incident on 10 July 1997 involving Captain Kolver.
(b)
The Committee also recommends that CASA reassess its requirements for
monitoring the operations and cabin and cockpit air quality of the BAe 146
aircraft operating in Australia and, where necessary, introduce regulations
under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 specifying:
m
a specific
national standard for checking and monitoring the engine seals and air quality
in all passenger commercial jet aircraft;
m
maintenance
procedures (including specific maintenance procedures for ageing aircraft);
m
specific,
appropriate maintenance and operational procedures for the BAe 146 which pay
particular attention to the need to ensure aircraft are withdrawn from
operational flying and serviced to ensure any operating faults resulting in oil
leaks, fumes or smoke are immediately repaired;
m
that incident
reports should now be specifically designed so as to reflect the history of the
cabin air problem that has been encountered on the BAe 146;
m
sources of
contamination in the cabin and cockpit environment in the BAe 146 be identified
and further evaluated using appropriate sampling and analytical technology for
the contaminants which, for example, might result from the burning of
lubricating oil used in the BAe 146 engines;
m
companies
operating BAe 146 and other passenger commercial jet aircraft in Australia
provide CASA with specific reports on the results of monitoring these matters
within an appropriate timeframe, whether quarterly or six-monthly, in order
that CASA can assess the operations of the aircraft; and
m
air quality
monitoring and compulsory reporting guidelines for all passenger jet aircraft
operators.
The Committee recommends that CASA adopt the
modification to aircraft air circulation systems proposal for the BAe 146
aircraft by the aircraft’s manufacturer as compulsory for all BAe 146 operating
in Australia and that this be achieved by preparation and issue by CASA of an
appropriate form of maintenance direction under the Civil Aviation Regulations.
The Committee also recommends that
registration of BAe 146 aircraft operating in Australia be reviewed, and that
renewal of Air Operating Certificates and registration of the BAe 146 be
subject to completion of those recommended modifications as a condition for
continued registration of the aircraft.
The Committee believes that development of an
appropriate and accurate test for the presence of any chemical fumes in
aircraft cabins is essential. The Committee accordingly recommends that CASA
liase with operators to develop a standardised, compulsory monitoring program
which provides for testing cabin aircraft air during fume events.
That the issue of cabin air quality be
reviewed by the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission with a view
to including aerotoxic syndrome in appropriate codes as a matter of reference
for future Workers Compensation and other insurance cases.
The Committee recommends that the Minister
for Transport request the Strategic Research Development Committee of the
National Health and Medical Research Council to set up and undertake an
appropriate research program on the effect of exposure to aircraft cabin air on
air crew and passengers. The Committee also recommends that the Minister advise
the Parliament on the form and duration of, such a program as part of the
Government response to this report.
While the Committee is aware that the cases
referred to are a matter of state jurisdiction, the Committee recommends that
the Minister for Transport, in co-operation with appropriate State Ministers,
appoint an experienced, retired judicial officer or eminent person who is
appropriately qualified to conduct a review of unsuccessful or inordinately
delayed employees’ compensation cases, pilots’ loss of license insurance,
personal income protection, and with-held superannuation/other insurance claims
made for personal injury and loss of employment as a result of ill health
claimed to result from exposure to fumes on the BAe 146 and other aircraft.
That person should be asked to report to the Minister on any conclusions they
reach and whether those cases were dealt with according to requirements and
appropriate standards of procedural fairness.
The Committee also recommends that the
Minister table the conclusions and any recommendations it makes in the
Parliament.
The Committee recommends that the Minister
for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, as the Minister
responsible for national issues affecting occupational health and safety
authorise a review of the use of Mobil Jet Oil II and that the National
Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme be requested to conduct
this review.
The Committee also recommends that the potentially hazardous chemical components of Mobil Jet Oil II be referred to NICNAS as a priority for review and assessment.
The Committee recommends that CASA assess
how quickly fitting appropriate high-grade air filters can be made mandatory
for all commercial airliners flying in Australia to minimise any deleterious
health effects arising from poor aircraft cabin air on crew and passengers. In
view of proposed standards currently under consideration in the United States
of America and elsewhere, such a system should ideally be designed to remove at
least 99% of particles 0.3 micron or larger from recirculated cabin air.
National Academy of Sciences- The Airliner Cabin Environment - Air Quality &
Safety, 1986
·
A data collection program that measures airflow and
contamination in airplane cabins should be implemented
·
The committee
recommends that FAA establish a program to monitor selected health
effects on airliner crews
National Academy of Sciences- The Airliner Cabin
Environment and the Health of Passengers and crew
,December, 2001
Recommendations:
·
Air quality in commercial aircraft should be
monitored with a dual approach that includes a routine surveillance program and
a more focused research program.
·
Routine surveillance of a number of air-quality
characteristics (O3, CO, CO2, fine PM, cabin pressure, relative humidity, and
temperature ) should be implemented in a continuing program to characterize the
range of air quality found in aircraft.
·
A detailed research program is needed to investigate
specific questions about the possible association between air contaminants and observed or reported health effects.
Relevant subjects include factors that affect O3 concentrations in cabin air,
the need to lower cabin pressure altitude to prevent hypoxia in susceptible
cabin occupants, the adequacy of outside air ventilation flow rates, the
severity of events in which contaminants enter bleed air from oil-seal leaks or
other equipment malfunctions, the potential for pesticide exposure due to current disinsection practices, the
contribution of low relative humidity to the perception of dryness, and the
role of fine PM in generating health complaints.
·
Health surveillance should be integrated into the
air monitoring programs. Health surveillance is needed for the systematic
collection, analysis and reporting of health outcomes related to routine and
non routine conditions in commercial aircraft. On the basis of self-interest
and exposure, the cabin crew should be the vehicle through which the
surveillance system would operate.
·
Congress should designate a lead federal agency and
provide sufficient funds to conduct or direct the research program that is
aimed at filling major knowledge gaps identified in this report. An independent
advisory committee with appropriate scientific, medical and engineering
expertise should be constituted to oversee the research program to ensure that
its objectives are met.
House of Lords- Select Committee on Science & Technology- Session
1999-2000- 5th report Air travel & Health,
15 November, 2000 ·
Safety is
paramount in the airline industry and nobody would wish it otherwise. Our
concern is not that health is secondary to safety but that it has been woefully
neglected. We welcome the belated acceptance by the Department of the
Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR)[1]
that it has the lead within the United Kingdom, and We recommend the
Government to ensure that concern for passenger and crew health becomes a firm
priority (para 8.9) ·
We recommend the Government actively to pursue the strong UK
interest in passenger and crew health through its international contacts with
the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO) and other appropriate organisations, and we urge them all
actively to promote health…(Paragraph
8.10) ·
We recommend the United Kingdom and other governments to do
everything they can to reduce inertia within the international safety-focused
regulatory structures. (Paragraph 8.7) ·
we recommend that the present rules, agreements and attitudes
regarding the monitoring and recording of the general health of aircrew, over
and above their fitness to operate, should be reconsidered urgently. (Paragraph 3.48) ·
Air Quality- We recommend that airlines collect, record and use at least some
of the basic cabin environment data being continuously monitored, not only to
give authoritative substance to their refutation of the common allegations, but
also to provide a better basis for public confidence in these matters. Indeed,
we are surprised that they do not already do so. (Paragraph 5.49) ·
We recommend
airlines to carry out simple and inexpensive cabin atmosphere sampling
programmes from time to time, and to make provision for spot-sample collection
in the case of unusual circumstances. This would be helpful for passengers and
staff, and also benefit airlines themselves. (Paragraph 5.50) ·
We recommend that, in the light of the outcome, regulators consider extending cabin
air quality standards beyond those for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and
ozone for which they already provide. (Paragraph
5.51) ·
we recommend
the Government to commission research into the following matters as the highest
priority: §
(C) real time
monitoring of air quality and other aspects of the cabin environment, with a
view to establishing new and clear regulatory minima for passenger cabin
ventilation; DTLR - Study of Possible effects on Health of
Aircraft Cabin Environments, June, 2001 ·
Research Priorities
–High priority: Cabin Air Quality (CAQ) §
An investigation into
norms for the key CAQ parameters in flight, with multiple parameters measured
in 1 study. Relevant parameters include the oxygen saturation of a range of
crew members and passengers, pressures and rates of change, temperature, air
movement, humidity, ventilation rate and concentrations of common pollutants
and organophosphates. The research should also relate these factors to
self-reported health and comfort on flights