AIRCRAFT
AIR QUALITY:
WHAT’S WRONG WITH IT AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
Submitted
to
The
Aviation Subcommittee of
The
Transportation & Infrastructure Committee
U.S.
House of Representatives
June
3, 2003
Prepared
by the
Association
of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO
Washington,
DC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This systematic overview of problems with
aircraft air quality is submitted on behalf of the Association of Flight
Attendants (AFA), a labor union that represents more than 50,000 flight attendants
at 27 different airlines. At the heart of the failure of the US Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), the manufacturers, and the airlines to resolve
problems with aircraft air quality is their failure to acknowledge
problems with aircraft air quality. There are no standards for protective
measures or access to information necessary to prove individuals’ cases; there
is effectively no government oversight, allowing the steady flow of
"anecdotal" reports to be dismissed as unreliable, and therefore irrelevant.
It is no small task to describe and document
problems with air quality on aircraft; hence, the length of this submission.
The problems are varied, but the lack of oversight and protective measures is
common to all and is in desperate need of remedy. Here, seven problems with
aircraft air quality are described in detail, each accompanied by a series of
proposed actions. The highlights are described here:
Inadequate ventilation: In buildings, owners must meet minimum
ventilation standards intended to protect occupant health and comfort. On
aircraft, there is no ventilation standard, despite the fact that
aircraft are the most densely occupied of any environment. In buildings,
workers can request an OSHA investigation of indoor air quality. On aircraft,
there is no government body assigned to investigate related illness reports.
Further, there are no protections in place for flight attendants assigned to
fly to areas affected by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), even though
crewmembers do not have the option of "postponing non-essential
travel." The World Health Organization recognizes flight attendants as
potential "close contacts"; the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention does not. (Pages 6-14)
Polluted air supply on the ground. Exhaust fumes and heated deicing fluids can be ingested into the air
supply systems, especially during ground operations. (Page 14-15)
Exposure to heated oils and hydraulic fluids. Heated oils and
hydraulic fluids can leak or spill into the air supply systems during any phase
of flight, potentially exposing passengers and crew to carbon monoxide and
neurotoxins, such as tricresylphosphates. There are almost no protective
measures in place to prevent air supply contamination, and contaminated
aircraft can be – and are - dispatched as "airworthy." Chronic or even permanent neurological
damage can result, although affected passengers and crew have little recourse
without any record of air monitoring or access to maintenance records. Pilot
incapacitation is an additional risk. The FAA has shown no signs that it plans
to follow the recent National Research Council committee recommendation for
requisite carbon monoxide monitoring on all flights. (Pages 15-21)
Reduced oxygen in the ambient air during flight. During flight, the aircraft cabin is
maintained at a reduced pressure, generally equivalent to an altitude of 6,000
– 8,000 feet, although sometimes higher. At an effective altitude of 8,000
feet, the supply of oxygen is reduced by 25% relative to sea level. There is
evidence that the current "8000 feet standard", first issued in 1957,
is based not on health, but on operating costs, and that the reduced oxygen
supply may be inappropriately low for a substantial portion of the flying
public. (Pages 22-25)
Inadequate
attention to the thermal environment. Providing air nozzles
("gaspers") at each occupant seat and work area allows flight
attendants and passengers to adjust the temperature of their environment. This
is especially important in areas where flight attendants are physically active.
In addition, flight attendants regularly report that the galleys and jumpseats
located near the aircraft doors can be uncomfortably cold at ankle level,
presumably because the doors are poorly insulated. A standard that defines a
target temperature range and maximum vertical and horizontal temperature
differentials would address this problem. Door heaters have already proven an
effective and practical remedy. (Pages
25-26)
Exposure to ozone gas:
Symptoms associated with ozone exposure are well documented and include
respiratory distress and increased susceptibility to infection. Ozone levels
increase with altitude and latitude, and are highest in the late winter and
early spring. The exposure limit for ozone cited in the Federal Aviation
Regulations is 2.5 times higher than the workplace limit set by the National
Institute for Occupational Safety & Health. Airlines are under no
obligation to monitor or record ozone levels in the cabin. (Pages 26-29)
Exposure to potentially high concentrations
of pesticides: Some countries require that incoming aircraft are sprayed
with pesticides to kill any insects that may be on board and may carry disease.
The pesticides are applied in occupied or soon-to-be-occupied aircraft cabin
without any measures to inform or protect the health of passengers or crew.
Reported symptoms range from sinus problems and rash to anaphylactic shock and
nerve damage. Differences in exposure levels and individual susceptibilities
are described. The US Department of Transportation’s investigation into the
feasibility and efficacy of non-chemical methods to keep aircraft cabins insect
free must be actively supported. (Pages
30-34)
On behalf of our 50,000
members, AFA thanks the members of the Aviation Subcommittee for considering
these comments.
LIST
OF ACRONYMS
AFA Association of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO
ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning
Engineers
APU Auxiliary Power Unit (a key
component of aircraft air supply system)
BLS US Bureau of Labor Statistics
CDC US Centers for Disease Control &
Prevention
CFM/p Cubic feet of outside air per minute, supplied to each person
(a measure of ventilation rate)
DOT US Department of Transportation
FAA US Federal Aviation Administration
OSHA US Occupational Safety & Health
Administration
NIOSH US National Institute for Occupational
Safety & Health
ppm parts of contaminant per million parts of air
(used as a measure of airborne concentration)
SARS Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome
SLE Sea level equivalent pressure (a measure used to standardize ventilation rates and contaminant
concentrations)
TCPs Tricresylphosphates
WHO World Health Organization
Summary
of aircraft quality problems, impact on the health of passengers and crew, and
proposed actions.
Problem |
Health
Impact |
Proposed
Actions |
|
1. Inadequate ventilation |
·
Reports of stuffy,
smelly air and symptoms of "sick building syndrome" ·
Increased risk of
disease transmission |
·
Establish a minimum
ventilation standard for aircraft in operation, including the current fleet. ·
Require gaspers on
all aircraft types. ·
Recognize flight
attendants as at-risk for SARS transmission on aircraft. |
|
2. Exposure to exhaust fumes and deicing fluid, especially during ground operations |
·
Reports of respiratory
irritation, headache, nausea, etc. attributed to exposure to heated deicing
fluids and exhaust fumes. |
·
Implement specific
preventive measures to reduce the ingestion of exhaust fumes and deicing
fluids into the air supply system. |
|
3. Exposure to air contaminated with heated hydraulic
fluids and oils. |
·
Reports of serious
symptoms, including tremors, tunnel vision, and memory loss associated with
"smoke in the cabin incidents." Symptoms are consistent with
exposure to carbon monoxide and neurotoxic components of oils and hydraulic
fluids. |
·
Require in-duct
carbon monoxide monitoring on all flights and train pilots to respond to
elevated levels. ·
Implement specific
preventive measures to prevent the contamination of air supply systems,
already proven effective at airlines in other countries. ·
Ensure that crew and
passengers with particular medical documentation have timely access to
specific airline records necessary to prove their case. |
|
4. Inadequate oxygen during flight |
·
Reports of hypoxia
(dizziness, fainting, tunnel vision) and in-flight cardiovascular or
respiratory emergencies. |
·
Issue an operating
standard consistent with the original operating intent of the existing design
standard (i.e., 5,000-6,000 feet cabin altitude). At the very least, collect
blood oxygen saturation data from active cabin crew and a cross-section of
passengers to determine necessary cabin altitude requirements. |
(Continued on next page)
(Continued)
Problem |
Health
impact |
Proposed
Actions |
|
5. Inadequate attention to the thermal
environment |
·
Regular reports of
discomfort caused by cold air radiating from poorly-insulated doors into crew
work areas. Also, gaspers that allow passengers and crew to adjust their
local temperature are only optional. |
·
Establish a target
temperature range and maximum allowable temperature differentials (horizontal
and vertical). Door heaters have proven an effective remedy to maintain
reasonable temperature differentials in areas adjacent to poorly insulated
doors. ·
Require gaspers at
individual seats and crew work areas. |
|
6. Exposure to ozone gas |
·
Reports of
respiratory distress consistent with ozone exposure. FAA exposure limit is
not health based (e.g., 2.5 times higher than the NIOSH limit set for
workers). No air monitoring provisions for ozone |
·
Establish a health-based
ozone standard. ·
Require monitoring
on high-latitude flights and other elevated ozone areas during "ozone seasons." ·
Require that
catalytic converters installed on aircraft that fly polar routes during ozone
seasons be replaced more often. |
|
7. Exposure to pesticides |
·
Reports of symptoms
associated with exposure to pesticides and solvents, including anaphylactic
shock. Exposures can be significant and are unregulated. |
·
Actively support the
DOT-chaired task group that is investigating the feasibility and efficacy of
mechanical methods of disinsection to replace current chemical spraying
methods that jeopardize crew and passenger health. |